Win-win game - WikipediaForgot your login information? Avenhaus, R. Game theory as an approach to conflict resolution. Avenhaus, Rudolf. SAGE Knowledge. Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can create alerts and save clips, playlists, and searches.
Conflict analysis in environmental management
Conceived and designed the experiments: JCF. Performed the experiments: JCF. Coded the simulations: SD. Contributed to data analysis: DCK. Conflict destabilizes social interactions and impedes cooperation at multiple scales of biological organization. Of fundamental interest are the causes of turbulent periods of conflict.
A win—win game is game theory which is designed in a way that all participants can profit from the game in one way or the other. In conflict resolution , a win—win strategy is a collaborative strategy and conflict resolution process that aims to accommodate all participants. Group-dynamics win—win games have been increasingly popular since the end of the Vietnam war and have been successfully applied to all levels of society. Group-dynamics win—win games emphasize the importance of cooperation, fun, sharing, caring and overall group success in contrast to domination, egoistic behavior and personal gain. All players are treated as equally important and valuable. Win—win games often also carry an ethical message of caring for the environment and a holistic approach to life and society. Win—win games are a powerful tool to give people self-confidence and a "we" experience, especially when they have suffered from emotional isolation.
E-mail address: kwhipel uwaterloo. Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more. If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in. If you previously purchased this article, Log in to Readcube.
It seems that you're in Germany. We have a dedicated site for Germany. Game theory could be formally defined as a theory of rational decision in conflict situations. Models of such situations, as they are conceived in game theory, involve 1 a set of decision makers, called players; 2 a set of strategies available to each player; 3 a set of outcomes, each of which is a result of particular choices of strategies made by the players on a given play of the game; and 4 a set of payoffs accorded to each player in each of the possible outcomes. It is assumed that each player is 'individually rational', in the sense that his preference ordering of the outcomes is determined by the order of magnitudes of his and only his associated payoffs.