Just and Unjust wars summary | Just War Theory | Preemptive WarAny "moral talk" is simply epiphenomenal of underlying interests. MW discusses the classic passage for such a position - Thucydides's Melian Dialogue: Contra the Athenian generals, MW argues the destruction of Athens was not inevitable if Melos was left alone, there was simply a probability that Athens would have been weakend and a probability that this would have lead to its fall. Therefore, the destruction of Melos was not strictly necessary. There was the freedom to make a decision, and therefore room for moral debate. The position of the Athenian generals was a denial of that freedom, and a denial of the meaningfulness of moral argument.
Michael Walzer on Just War and Humanitarian Intervention
Just and Unjust wars summary
Peter Paret, Michael Walzer. New York: Basic Books. Most users should sign in with their email address. If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above.
By minimizing the human standpoint, however, Kelley overlooks both Eckhart's dialectical play between perspectives and his uncanny knack for expressing divine knowledge in human language. A more comprehensive interpretation would attend precisely to those " edges of language " Van Buren where the inversion of perspectives occurs. Such an explicitly hermeneutical approach would also involve thinking with Eckhart, and would owe a great deal to Mei. New York: Basic Books, Modern weaponry, ideology, and disregard for the moral rules dictated by the right to life have combined to made modern warfare savage beyond compare. An important attempt to reestablish the authority of moral rules in warfare has been made in Michael Walzer's ]itSt and Unjust Wars.